Re: Re: Gnutella 3
Arne Babenhauserheide <[email protected]> Sat, 27 Feb 2010 10:05:17 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.gnutella.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am Samstag, 27. Februar 2010 00:51:02 schrieb [email protected]: > Anyway, I don't think Gnutella 3.0 should be a paradigm shift. We need to > focus on the strengths of Gnutella 1.0 and remove (some of) its weaknesses > so as to make it even more powerful. > > Gnutella 3.0, the Lord of P2P networks :-) Maybe we could start thinking about that by listing it's strengths and weaknesses of the currently existing Gnutella. Then we can check if we can fix the weaknesses without breaking existing servents and see what parts really need an invasive change. Best as a one-week brainstorm first (that means: free listing of perceived strength and weaknesses and no criticising of others opinions). A brainstorm often allows seeing factors which would be overlooked otherwise, because it improves free association (but please stay on topic: strength and weaknesses of Gnutella). Let me begin: + Strength: Requires very little bandwidth for global connectivity (a leaf can run off a 56k Modem, an UP off a ISDN line). + Strength: Powerful fully decentral swarming. - Weakness: No included community building (like torrent sites with statistcs and verification). Please add the strengths and weaknesses you see (in short) which weren't yet named. Best wishes, Arne --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- - singing a part of the history of free software - http://infinite-hands.draketo.de [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]