[discuss] Limewire license compatible with GPL3?

--===============8646642095426848394==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1886179.ZMJNoH6DJM";
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

--nextPart1886179.ZMJNoH6DJM
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

We have reused some of Limewire's code (related to Universal Plug and Play=
=20
support) in Freenet (actually in a freenet plugin). Is Limewire=20
GPL3-compatible? It's not clear in Freenet, for example, because we didn't=
=20
have explicit license headers in most of our files and just included=20
COPYING ... so it could be read as GPL2-only rather than GPL2-or-later. The=
=20
file in question is com.limegroup.gnutella.UPnPManager.

Thanks.
Matthew Toseland, Freenet Project chief developer.

--nextPart1886179.ZMJNoH6DJM
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBG4YnmA9rUluQ9pFARAuvYAKC8d2AUH/8bUDh3qjAulAhpWWjDiACfZ0A3
bNAodFMAjS5lUlgfpSF5Lcg=
=SiRK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart1886179.ZMJNoH6DJM--

--===============8646642095426848394==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.limewire.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

--===============8646642095426848394==--