Re: GnuTLS performance on slower devices

Dan Kegel <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.gnutls.general
Message-ID <CAPF-yOawdK2DOFsFZWYY_s=Sxdi9LXcevfb3S093Mdz=6LiEBw@mail.gmail.com>
I added a question about the affected cpu type(s) at
https://github.com/TigerVNC/tigervnc/issues/737

On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 10:55 AM Shawn Hall <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> One of our customers uses TigerVNC for graphical connections to systems.  There are more details here https://github.com/TigerVNC/tigervnc/issues/737, but we’ve found that on slower devices such as the Microsoft Surface Pro 4 that there was a noticeable slowdown when encryption is enabled.  In talking to the TigerVNC developers, we’ve found that this slowdown is due to some fundamental parts of GnuTLS such a memory allocation and buffer management.
>
>
>
> Is there any work in progress or planned that would improve GnuTLS performance on slower devices?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Shawn
>
>
>
> Disclaimer
>
> Please see our Privacy Notice for information on how we process personal data.
>
> This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses and malware, and may have been automatically archived by Mimecast Ltd, an innovator in Software as a Service (SaaS) for business.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnutls-help mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnutls-help

_______________________________________________
Gnutls-help mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnutls-help
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.