Re: TLS 1.3 post-handshake authentication vs. exceptions

Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.gnutls.general
Message-ID <CAJU7zaJ-HaeOe7e-0+b37DcFD_RKavQwhOTPg8+-99XNYPGhTA@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 1:04 PM Ludovic Courtès <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> AIUI, TLS 1.3 post-handshake authentication requests can happen anytime,
> and thus clients need to be ready to deal with GNUTLS_E_REAUTH_REQUEST
> at any time.  In particular, ‘gnutls_record_recv’ might return this
> error, and the client has to call ‘gnutls_reauth’ at that point.

Right. A clarification, that these can happen only if the client or
server has explicitly enabled post-handshake authentication with the
corresponding gnutls_init() flag.

> In the Guile bindings, GnuTLS errors are mapped to Guile exceptions.
> The record layer is mapped to an I/O port, which is the abstraction used
> for file contents, sockets, etc. (similar to FILE* in C).
>
> The problem here is that you could get a GNUTLS_E_REAUTH_REQUEST
> exception in the middle of a read from an I/O ports.  This breaks
> abstraction because the caller of that read call may not know that the
> port happens to be a GnuTLS record port.

That should be similar to GNUTLS_E_REHANDSHAKE error. I'm not sure if
that can be the right solution but there is the option of
GNUTLS_AUTO_REAUTH.

regards,
Nikos

_______________________________________________
Gnutls-help mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnutls-help
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.