Re: How about some AC_MSG for dlopen?

Andreas Metzler <[email protected]> writes:

> ./configure is quiet about whether dlopening librariers is supported,
> would it make sense to a) add messages and perhaps b) provide a switch
> to force use of linking instead?

That sounds sensible to me, though I'm not sure what it is like a good
interface for (b).  Maybe --with-zstd, etc., could take a tri-state
argument (no/yes/[dlopen]) and if "yes", the library is linked at build
time?

Regards,
-- 
Daiki Ueno