guile-gnutls copy at codeberg

--===============7114509554999819078==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain

Hi

I pushed the guile-gnutls git repository to codeberg:

https://codeberg.org/guile-gnutls/guile-gnutls

This is a manually maintained repository to explore if we could move
guile-gnutls to codeberg.  What do you think?

I feel I don't have a lot authority over this project, so I don't know
if there are any opinions on this -- I tried to cc some possibly
relevant people (sorry if I missed anyone, anyone else on gnutls-help
feel free to chime in with opinions).  I'd like to co-maintain this
(send me your codeberg username), and I'm also okay reverting back to
gitlab if people think moving codeberg is a negative.

Further things I'm aware of:

- GitLab issue tracker - should we keep this read-write, or turn it
  read-only?  Is there any point in migrating issues to codeberg?  Is
  such migration even possible?

- Gitlab Merge requests - same question

- GitLab Pipelines - this is a very important QA tool and I wouldn't
  want to release anything without having all those tests.  So whatever
  we do, the GitLab CI/CD will be important for some time still.  I
  don't speak Forgejo CI/CD but will try to learn, but it appears far
  behind GitLab CI/CD feature-wise.  I don't see any problem having a
  GitLab read-only mirror project for CI/CD purposes, I do that for some
  other projects without GitLab presence.

- GitLab release pages - I've been using this feature as a learning
  excercise, but I'm not sure how important it is.  I guess codeberg has
  something similar.  I find these pages rather ugly, and prefer old
  school HTTPS/FTP publication with stable URLs and a mirror network.
  Savannah and ftp.gnu.org provides this, and we can continue use that
  (or not).

Btw, I pushed a copy of GitLab 'master' branch to a 'main' branch on
Codeberg since it seemed like a nice time to change branch name too.

If anyone has a guile-gnutls contribution they would like to open a pull
request for on codeberg, we can test the new way of working.  I expect
to manually merge things back to gitlab for some time, pending feedback.

/Simon

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=yxwN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--


--===============7114509554999819078==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Gnutls-help mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnutls-help

--===============7114509554999819078==--