Re: Implementation of new priority strings
Timo Gerke <[email protected]> Fri, 10 Apr 2026 23:12:24 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.gnutls.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi all,
I just wanted to extend my examples a bit.
CURVE-EdDSA-25519 includes GROUP-X25519 and SIGN-EdDSA-Ed25519
CURVE-EdDSA-448 includes GROUP-X448 and SIGN-EdDSA-Ed448
CURVE-EdDSA-ALL includes CURVE-EdDSA-25519, CURVE-EdDSA-448 and future
not jet specified EdDSA curves.
Sorry,
Timo
Am 10.04.26 um 17:23 schrieb Timo Gerke:
> Hi all,
>
> I suggest to implement a priority string, SIGN-EdDSA for example,
> which allows to enable all (existing and future) EdDSA curves.
>
> Or alternatively as string, like CURVE-25519 for example, which
> enables X25519 (Key Exchange) and Ed25519 (signature). Same for
> Ed448/X448.
>
> Regards,
>
> Timo Gerke
>
--
Timo Gerke
Lohkoppelweg 40
22529 Hamburg
Germany
Fon: +49-40-24433033
Fax: +49-40-22628453
If you think technology can solve your security problems,
then you don't understand the problems and you don't
understand the technology.
Bruce Schneier, amerikanischer Kryptograph