Re: robots.txt (was Re: Download a whole gopherhole using wget/curl?)

James Mills <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.gopher.general
Message-ID <CALGqR9LAirDQ5zBoWH90PN00NFF6BQWo6gC-=4RHk8cWunjzGQ@mail.gmail.com>
Silly question; But isn't the User-Agent kind of useless here since a
Gopher request is basically just a selector for a resource?
There are no headers
No User-Agent to identify a request

What am I missing here :)

Kind Regards

James

James Mills / prologic

E: [email protected]
W: prologic.shortcircuit.net.au


On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 3:39 PM Sean Conner <sean-/[email protected]> wrote:

> It was thus said that the Great Christoph Lohmann once stated:
> > Good point. In eomyidae you have two possibilities:
> >
> >       User-Agent: *
> >       Disallow: *
>
>   Okay, but this diverts from the HTTP version of robots.txt (from my
> understanding unless it's been updated since I was last dealing with this
> stuff).
>
> > and
> >
> >       User-Agent: *
> >       Disallow:
>
>   This actually has a different meaning from the HTTP version---there this
> means "all browsers allowed to crawl" (back from when it robots.txt was
> first developed).
>
>   -spc
>
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.