Re: robots.txt (was Re: Download a whole gopherhole using wget/curl?)
James Mills <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.gopher.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CALGqR9LAirDQ5zBoWH90PN00NFF6BQWo6gC-=4RHk8cWunjzGQ@mail.gmail.com> |
Silly question; But isn't the User-Agent kind of useless here since a Gopher request is basically just a selector for a resource? There are no headers No User-Agent to identify a request What am I missing here :) Kind Regards James James Mills / prologic E: [email protected] W: prologic.shortcircuit.net.au On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 3:39 PM Sean Conner <sean-/[email protected]> wrote: > It was thus said that the Great Christoph Lohmann once stated: > > Good point. In eomyidae you have two possibilities: > > > > User-Agent: * > > Disallow: * > > Okay, but this diverts from the HTTP version of robots.txt (from my > understanding unless it's been updated since I was last dealing with this > stuff). > > > and > > > > User-Agent: * > > Disallow: > > This actually has a different meaning from the HTTP version---there this > means "all browsers allowed to crawl" (back from when it robots.txt was > first developed). > > -spc > >