Re: State of Gopher and TLS?
Mateusz Viste <mateusz-5L880J/[email protected]> Tue, 25 Oct 2022 10:55:14 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.gopher.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 25/10/2022 10:36, Hiltjo Posthuma wrote: > Here you can find some information about TLS over gopher. > It doesn't violate the gopher specification: > gopher://bitreich.org/0/usr/20h/phlog/2020-06-07T18-28-23-863932.md RFC 1436 is clear about the fact that Gopher is a simple, text-based TCP protocol. One extract below, but there are more: In essence, the Gopher protocol consists of a client connecting to a server and sending the server a selector (a line of text, which may be empty) via a TCP connection. Feel free to call the TLS contraption "gophers" or whatever else, but it is not Gopher. The document you linked to proposes a way of implementing dual protocol support so a server can act simultaneously as a Gopher and "gophers" server sharing the same port. It does not mean that "gophers" is compatible with the Gopher protocol. A Gopher client is unable to access "gophers" content, unless said content is also available via Gopher. Mateusz gopher://gopher.viste.fr