Re: State of Gopher and TLS?
Mateusz Viste <mateusz-5L880J/[email protected]> Tue, 25 Oct 2022 12:52:48 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.gopher.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 25/10/2022 11:53, barana . wrote: > when you upgrade servers so that people who browse with low h.p. > devices are locked out.... > (...) > gopher servers leave behind the only clients that gopher effectively > serves.... kinda pointless. Wholeheartedly agree. Gopher is a technology from the early 90s. Runs great on my 8086, and that's what makes it valuable: it's dead simple, lightweight and has been around for a long time. Adding complexity to such a protocol is nonsense, it can only lead to fragmentation of an already very sparse* community. If one wants to play with "modern security", then there is a lot of far more interesting options, like gnunet, ipfs, tor, etc. No need to fracture good old Gopher with some broken TLS abomination. *as of today, the Observable Gopherspace Universe Project reports a mere 306 operational servers. Mateusz gopher://gopher.viste.fr