Re: To evolve or not to evolve
Nuno Silva <[email protected]> Tue, 25 Oct 2022 18:47:20 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.gopher.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <Y1ghJ3VKW0dTVrCn@evenstar> |
On 2022-10-25 19:31 +0200, Mateusz Viste wrote: > On 25/10/2022 19:07, Hiltjo Posthuma wrote: > > On bitreich.org the community started documenting some common > > addiions/extensions in use today. (...) > > gopher://bitreich.org/1/scm/gopher-protocol/file/gopher-extension.md.gph > > That's nice. Not that I agree with all that is written there, but I like > very much the approach of trying to formally document the status quo. > Too bad it is limited to a gopher sub-community, but that's the price of > a fragmented user base I guess, and I don't see any solution to that anyway. > > I'd be curious to know: are there any other such initiatives out there? Didn't somebody from this list at one point set up a Google Docs document to document the protocol and its extensions? -- Nuno Silva