Extensions to Gopher, outcomes
Viatrix <[email protected]> Fri, 9 Feb 2024 23:10:58 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.gopher.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20240209231058.03da1544@lm-Satellite-Pro-C70-B> |
--Sig_/Mq+FzLQRzw1=ypySo3Cc8=0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello gophers, I am new to this mailing list and I am wondering what extensions to Gopher have been proposed on the list, and what their outcomes were. I recently started attempting to document the current state of Gopher: <gopher://tilde.32bit.cafe/1/~vivivi/gopher_in_practice> but I have not yet aggregated much info from this very mailing-list. I'm seeing evidence that gophernicus.org also had similar documentation to what I'm trying to make, but connecting to it with gopher:// today just seems to stall. I did find in this list's archives the following document: <https://tinyurl.com/gopherrfc-draft> I will comment (admittedly a decade or so late :p ) that 'example.com' is probably not the best domain to use for an intended invalid link, especially when the '.invalid' TLD exists for this very purpose. And I will ask if the 'M' type was intended to follow the message/rfc822 format =E2=80=94 that's the impression I got when testing Go= pher clients but perhaps it's more complicated than that. --Sig_/Mq+FzLQRzw1=ypySo3Cc8=0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEECRScMMLqbawFEVXLbbTQGyXkVXUFAmXHIYIACgkQbbTQGyXk VXUZjggAojrk1EIvvqQ5nSQbjLReO7ZXBVVaJ4NZT/3fzDxotMYUvmsEdg4aDgZF r/jhVu27gWjBf8rHiNrjo7+cqWlpzDyiKzpyhvcV7ZrDnofS19TWWdTTJg2QG+4/ Uu8X3+w/Ob9gJer80E1JZwhKHC8bOrPkhXd7t+FoiitTVWVQxERiAU5iqYijjRW6 9xCVzfcqv+JKK+leotGrZ0sgsWT2eADsEx+siw551zW1bGBeEZQLoiGfMsiDqUM4 hv4ldH71ZXrbk5N4eV1PN90C5Zo5gflanYFJ/tXlj8a1S+bHb1npd7jFZbg6h4LM SiRQ9caLIjGeZ23EV/12xsHJ2PPkpQ== =2swr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/Mq+FzLQRzw1=ypySo3Cc8=0--