Re: Is this list still going?

have been, who wrote, past tense. this topic is the only traffic the =
list has seen since April. I get info and updates by carrier pigeon more =
frequently.


regards

=E2=96=88=E2=96=84=E2=96=80=E2=96=84=E2=96=80  cat K.
=E2=96=88=E2=96=80=E2=96=84=E2=96=80=E2=96=84  B 4 U D W 3 R K 5 _
=E2=96=84=E2=96=84=E2=96=80=E2=96=80=E2=96=80  +1 (929) 601-BAUD

> On 14 Nov 2025, at 10:38=E2=80=AFAM, Nuno Silva =
<[email protected]> wrote:
>=20
> On 2025-11-13, cat K. wrote:
>=20
>> I maintain a Gopher presence (several if you're keeping score) but I
>> wasn't on this list. I joined the list because of this topic to ask;
>> why is this Gopher mailing list - ostensibly THE Gopher mailing list =
-
>> the single worst representation of Gopher space going?
>>=20
>> Gopher is currently better represented on TikTok than this list and
>> it's embarrassing. who is list for except for people who
>> want-to-but-never-will use Gopher, people who used-to-but-now-don't
>> use Gopher and people who just subscribe to mailing lists out of some
>> bizarre tech FOMO?
>>=20
>> this list has less traffic than your mom's OnlyFans, it's cringe.
>=20
> Lists not having too much traffic isn't bad. It may even be good or
> excellent and mean that when there *is* traffic, it's related to the
> topic, and people stay subscribed because of that.
>=20
> It's also not fair to describe this list as "people who
> used-to-but-now-don't use Gopher", specs and features have been
> described in this list, people who wrote clients are on this list too,
> and I've already recognized names in replies to this thread from =
people
> who do run gopherholes.
>=20
> --=20
> Nuno Silva
>=20