Re: OT: OT: Packet Radio ML (was: rude behaviour (was: Re: Is this list still going?))
philmacfly <philmacfly-1eBo6Eg+E38e20/[email protected]> Fri, 14 Nov 2025 18:43:18 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.gopher.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
There is a packet radio ml? Am 14.11.2025 um 18:24 schrieb Brian Koontz: > Cat, you can always start your own gopher discussion on discord or wherever you think traction can be gained. I don’t think anyone here would oppose that. > > But in the end, just about every esoteric mailing list I subscribe to (gopher, pdp-11, packet radio, diy efi, vintage jaguar, etc.) is catacomb-silent, with occasional bursts of static. I don’t think it’s a gopher problem. Most of the world doesn’t share our enthusiasm for eclectic topics like gopher. And tbh I sort of like it that way. > >> On Nov 14, 2025, at 7:15 AM, cat K. <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I am interested in the topic and I do talk about Gopher incessantly, to anyone that will listen, and then they say; "wow! Gopher sounds great, is there anywhere people are discussing Gopher such as a mailing list or similar?" >> >> and I point them to the Tombs of the Blind Dead that is the [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> mailing list and womp womp they completely lose interest because all they find is curmudgeons and dust bunnies. >> >> >> regards >> >> █▄▀▄▀ cat K. >> █▀▄▀▄ B 4 U D W 3 R K 5 _ >> ▄▄▀▀▀ +1 (929) 601-BAUD >> >>> On 14 Nov 2025, at 9:19 PM, Nuno Silva <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> On 2025-11-14, cat K. wrote: >>>> >>>> On 14 Nov 2025, at 12:29 PM, John Goerzen >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> On Fri, Nov 14 2025, cat K. wrote: >>>>>> have been, who wrote, past tense. this topic is the only traffic the list has >>>>>> seen since April. I get info and updates by carrier pigeon more frequently. >>>>> You are welcome to unsubscribe if you don't like this list. >>>> and miss out on scintilating conversations like this? no thanks! >>> Maybe you should. >>> >>> Either you're interested in the topic and talk about it, or just leave >>> us be. >>> >>> If you prefer TikTok and OnlyFans, go talk about Gopher there. Don't try >>> to bully everyone else in discussing gopher like you use these two. >>> >>> If we wanted to go at it like in TikTok, my guess is we'd be in TikTok. >>> >>> I was even under the impression TikTok was mostly a video-centric >>> outfit, which really isn't comparable to text in accessibility... >>> >>> But, on that, the non-endless-scroll and the non-real-time nature of >>> e-mail are also selling points of a mailing list for those who >>> appreciate this medium. >>> >>> If you don't appreciate the medium, don't try to turn this into a >>> barrage of video, emojis and embedded animated images that aren't >>> actually GIF despite being called that. Instead, understand that others >>> do prefer this text-centric medium and the on-topic nature of a >>> low-traffic list. >>> >>> -- >>> Nuno Silva >>>