Re: Test Git repository for INN

Julien ÉLIE <[email protected]> writes:

> Done on both 2.6 and main branches.
> Is there a need to also clean up previous branches?  Maybe only the $Id$
> strings in POD documentation for 2.4 and 2.5 branches for which HTML 
> documentation is still generated on your web site?  (I've not tried to
> merge the commit from 2.6 against these older branches, maybe it applies 
> without too many conflicts.)

I'm not too worried about the older branches and think we can leave them
alone.  I've been maintaining the documentation on my web site because it
was fairly easy, but I'm not sure whether anyone really uses it, so having
a stray somewhat-odd $Id$ string in the generated documentation doesn't
seem like a huge problem.

(The documentation is still based on Subversion because I haven't gotten
my tooling switched over but that should be fixed shortly, since I have a
week of vacation to catch up on personal projects.)

-- 
Russ Allbery ([email protected])             <https://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>

    Please send questions to the list rather than mailing me directly.
     <https://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/faqs/questions.html> explains why.
_______________________________________________
inn-workers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/inn-workers