Re: Parametring cancel processing (Cancel-Lock vs unauthenticated cancels)

Hi Grant,

[about retiring "innd -C"]
>> I think it shouldn't be a no-op; it should either work to override the 
>> config setting or we should remove it so that it will cause an error 
>> and people will have to update their configuration.  Otherwise, I 
>> think we risk silent and surprising behavior change.
> 
> I too am against the no-op.
> 
> I'd much rather see it be a warning for one (or more) versions and 
> eventually be tantamount to a syntax error to fail hard / fast.

That sounds great for a soft transition period.  I'll put a warning in 
2.7.0 and really remove it in 2.8.0.

-- 
Julien ÉLIE

« Boire du café empêche de dormir. Par contre, dormir empêche de boire
   du café. » (Philippe Geluck)
_______________________________________________
inn-workers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/inn-workers