Re: Disabling XBATCH by default in innd
Julien ÉLIE <[email protected]> Wed, 23 Mar 2022 19:14:26 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.inn |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Russ, >> Maye we could rename "nolist" and "noresendid" to "list" and "resendid" >> in the major 2.7.0 release? innupgrade can do the change. This way, >> we'll get rid of all double negatives in incoming.conf. > > I know it's always disruptive to change things like this, but personally > I'd lean in favor of this. What do other folks think? Let's wait for other opinions then. >> We could also remove "comment" and "email" parameters which are unused >> in the code (I've checked), just mentioned "marked as reserved for >> future use" in documentation. > > "comment" is, IIRC, left over from a desire to make the configuration file > readable and writable by code without losing information. That work was > never complete, and at this point I think if we were going to pursue this > again, we'd use a different format like YAML. (The Python ruamel.yaml > module supports reading and writing YAML while preserving comments and > order.) I'm in favor of dropping this. Maybe innupgrade could convert > any that it finds to actual comments? Yes, I was meaning to drop code parsing for "comment" and "email", and innupgrade would just comment the lines (and not remove them). > "email" I'm a bit more worried about since it's possible that people have > used that field as documentation to record the contact email address of a > peer. I have no idea if anyone has done that or not, but keeping the > field is also fairly cheap, so I'm not sure if it's worth the potential > disruption. Although maybe there too innupgrade could work some magic. It would become commented in incoming.conf: #email: "[email protected]" -- Julien ÉLIE « Perl programming is an *empirical* science. » (Larry Wall) -- inn-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/inn-workers