Re: [nesg] RE: status update for ESnet
Mike Collins <[email protected]> Tue, 16 Jul 2002 19:04:05 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.ipv6.exchanges |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Michel: The simple answer is that 128-bit prefixes are required for the loopback address in a Juniper router. Host address are required for the loopback for both IPv4 and IPv6. Regards, Mike Collins LBNL/ESnet ============================================================================== Bob, > Interfaces addresses are globally unique and are /64s. > Loop back addresses are globally unique /128s from a common /64. I am curious about the /128 loopbacks. I typically don't treat loopbacks differently than any other interface on a regular subnet, meaning I give them a /64 as well. I understand that, contrarily to /127 commonly used on ptp links, /128 addresses do not violate [addrarch], so doing this is ok. However, the use of /128s out of a "loopback pool" /64 makes loopbacks unaggregatable, where using /64s could make them aggregatable. I am curious about the reasons behind the choice of /128s for loopbacks. Is there a deliberate choice to make them unaggregatable (which has operational advantages as well as drawbacks)? Thanks Michel.