Re: lunchtime mtg
"JORDI PALET MARTINEZ" <[email protected]> Thu, 17 Jul 2003 14:53:35 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.ipv6.exchanges |
|---|---|
| Organization | Consulintel |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, Regarding the Euro6IX network (not euro6), peering policy, and so on, please take a look into D2.2. You can find it at www.euro6ix.org, documents/deliverables. Isn't really a conflict what we have, is just the goal of the funding, to be for R&D and no commercial traffic, but as said, today we don't consider IPv6 commercial in practically any case if someone want to connect to learn or try. Regards, Jordi ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 12:26 PM Subject: lunchtime mtg > TODO: revise 6bone routing guideline > > > matt@bt, UK6IX > 15 native ether customer > 45 tunnel bgp > 800 tunnel broker (actually using) > > connect to euro6 > investigate address allocation policies > business models > interworking QoS, multicast, ... > 6bone native and tunnel connection > tag tunnel route with community > > hexago > david kessens, nokia > 6bone registry > PAIX customer > everything is working > > jordi, euro6 > 5+ locations L3 interconnected exchanges > conflict w/ funding issue (EU and private companies are funding) > > sekiya@wide, NSPIXP2/6 > NSPIXP2 - dualstack > NSPIXP6 - v6 only, 66 ISPs, from 2-3Mbps/s > > slightly increasing traffic/participants > > mark prior from AU > no exchange yet, planning > > christian, joint project (6net project) > germany > r&d network > customers - more than 20 > most of them are tunnels > > olaf@deutch telecom > researching ix > > telecom italia, euro6 > experimental network in telecom italia > tunnel broker service, 2000 user connected > 100 experimental customer connecteed by static tunnel > italian defence agency connected > > denhagg city > > amsix > 26 participants, uses 30 ports (30 routers) > native > tunnel server running from oct-feb (experiment) > many went to dual stack config > > web/mail server over ipv6 > multihoming experiment using two /48 prefixes from 2 upstreams > > tom, MCI/MAE > commercial service @ MAE locations > framerelay/atm > 4 v6 participants, 3 native 1 tunnel > > small AS for research (6066), running dual stack > > FRNIC > provide .fr nameserver at 3 exchanges, all of them run dual stack > some of ix use separate vlan for v6, add reluctance to participants > > 70 ipv4 peering, 10 ipv6 peering > > even though policy is global, specific policy of RIPE/ARIN/APNIC differs > some of them do not accept /48 no-export route > need some document > > francis dupont > multihomed to 2 isps > > hexago > 6TAP, freenet6 (10000, 2 machines) > > itojun > IIJ: ISP > 200+ /48 customers, tunnel and native, commercial service > IX: NSPIXP2, NSPIXP6, JPIX, JPNAP, NY6IX, NYIIX, PAIX palo alto, > 6TAP palo alto > planning: MAE, Equinix > > 4+ commercial ISPs in japan > more experimenting > > tim chown > geant 10Gb dualstack > 25 national research network > half of them natively connected ipv6 > no 6bone route on geant (3ffe) > > growing community of wireless network by students > mesh networks, dsl, grassroot network > looking for site-local equivalent > > SIN government > ipv6 exchange in singaren > 4 connections to the exchange > couple of ISPs looking at doing IPv6 > ***************************** Madrid 2003 Global IPv6 Summit Presentations and videos on-line at: http://www.ipv6-es.com