Re: lunchtime mtg

"JORDI PALET MARTINEZ" <[email protected]> Thu, 17 Jul 2003 14:53:35 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.network.ipv6.exchanges
Organization Consulintel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi,

Regarding the Euro6IX network (not euro6), peering policy, and so on, please take a look into D2.2. You can find it at
www.euro6ix.org, documents/deliverables.

Isn't really a conflict what we have, is just the goal of the funding, to be for R&D and no commercial traffic, but as said, today
we don't consider IPv6 commercial in practically any case if someone want to connect to learn or try.

Regards,
Jordi

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 12:26 PM
Subject: lunchtime mtg


> TODO: revise 6bone routing guideline
>
>
> matt@bt, UK6IX
> 15 native ether customer
> 45 tunnel bgp
> 800 tunnel broker (actually using)
>
> connect to euro6
> investigate address allocation policies
> business models
> interworking QoS, multicast, ...
> 6bone native and tunnel connection
> tag tunnel route with community
>
> hexago
> david kessens, nokia
> 6bone registry
> PAIX customer
> everything is working
>
> jordi, euro6
> 5+ locations L3 interconnected exchanges
> conflict w/ funding issue (EU and private companies are funding)
>
> sekiya@wide, NSPIXP2/6
> NSPIXP2 - dualstack
> NSPIXP6 - v6 only, 66 ISPs, from 2-3Mbps/s
>
> slightly increasing traffic/participants
>
> mark prior from AU
> no exchange yet, planning
>
> christian, joint project (6net project)
> germany
> r&d network
> customers - more than 20
> most of them are tunnels
>
> olaf@deutch telecom
> researching ix
>
> telecom italia, euro6
> experimental network in telecom italia
> tunnel broker service, 2000 user connected
> 100 experimental customer connecteed by static tunnel
> italian defence agency connected
>
> denhagg city
>
> amsix
> 26 participants, uses 30 ports (30 routers)
> native
> tunnel server running from oct-feb (experiment)
> many went to dual stack config
>
> web/mail server over ipv6
> multihoming experiment using two /48 prefixes from 2 upstreams
>
> tom, MCI/MAE
> commercial service @ MAE locations
> framerelay/atm
> 4 v6 participants, 3 native 1 tunnel
>
> small AS for research (6066), running dual stack
>
> FRNIC
> provide .fr nameserver at 3 exchanges, all of them run dual stack
> some of ix use separate vlan for v6, add reluctance to participants
>
> 70 ipv4 peering, 10 ipv6 peering
>
> even though policy is global, specific policy of RIPE/ARIN/APNIC differs
> some of them do not accept /48 no-export route
> need some document
>
> francis dupont
> multihomed to 2 isps
>
> hexago
> 6TAP, freenet6 (10000, 2 machines)
>
> itojun
> IIJ: ISP
> 200+ /48 customers, tunnel and native, commercial service
> IX: NSPIXP2, NSPIXP6, JPIX, JPNAP, NY6IX, NYIIX, PAIX palo alto,
> 6TAP palo alto
> planning: MAE, Equinix
>
> 4+ commercial ISPs in japan
> more experimenting
>
> tim chown
> geant 10Gb dualstack
> 25 national research network
> half of them natively connected ipv6
> no 6bone route on geant (3ffe)
>
> growing community of wireless network by students
> mesh networks, dsl, grassroot network
> looking for site-local equivalent
>
> SIN government
> ipv6 exchange in singaren
> 4 connections to the exchange
> couple of ISPs looking at doing IPv6
>

*****************************
Madrid 2003 Global IPv6 Summit
Presentations and videos on-line at:
http://www.ipv6-es.com