(racoon 718) Re: Does racoon work with link local IPv6 addresses?
Aidas Kasparas <[email protected]> Thu, 09 Sep 2004 19:02:00 +0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.ipv6.kame.racoon |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Juan Antonio MartÃnez Navarro wrote: >> -- racoon searches for peer _without_ interface name -- let's provide >>it this way! > > Racoon finds peer _without_ interface name, but i think when it tries to > start up the tunnel, bind fails because it uses peer name without the > interface. Racoon return this result: Hmmmm, could you please run setkey -DP and check, do you see interfaces in policies. I'm starting to suspect that there is a bug in kenel's pfkey implementation, and therefore link-local address interfaces are lost in kernel! > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > ... > DEBUG: configuration found for fe80::202:b3ff:fe60:206e. > INFO: IPsec-SA request for fe80::202:b3ff:fe60:206e queued due to no > phase1 found. > DEBUG: === > INFO: initiate new phase 1 negotiation: > fe80::202:b3ff:feb8:1857[500]<=>fe80::202:b3ff:fe60:206e[500] > INFO: begin Identity Protection mode. > DEBUG: new cookie: > 79b33a35a52af1aa > DEBUG: add payload of len 48, next type 0 > DEBUG: 80 bytes from fe80::202:b3ff:feb8:1857[500] to > fe80::202:b3ff:fe60:206e[500] > DEBUG: sockname 2001:720:1710:0:202:b3ff:feb8:1857[500] > DEBUG: send packet from fe80::202:b3ff:feb8:1857[500] > DEBUG: send packet to fe80::202:b3ff:fe60:206e[500] <----------------- > ERROR: bind 1 (Invalid argument) <------------------------------------ > ERROR: sendfromto failed > ERROR: failed to begin ipsec sa negotication. > -------------------------------------------------------------------------