(racoon 887) Re: Racoon NAT-T Progress?

Matt Titus <[email protected]> Wed, 29 Dec 2004 15:02:57 -0800

Newsgroups	gmane.network.ipv6.kame.racoon
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

Wolfgang Hennerbichler wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-12-29 at 18:20 +0100, Ralf Spenneberg wrote:
> 
>>Using KLIPS or the native IPsec Stack?
> 
> 
> Using the native IPsec Stack - the official kernel from kernel.org
> without any further patches. 

How did the implementers address the IPR issues? Microsoft and Cisco (at 
least) still have patent claims pertaining to NAT traversal and UDP 
encapsulation.

Matt Titus