Re: *** VOTE *** Permlink of cookies

On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 10:53:38PM +0100, David Leadbeater wrote:
> Andrew wrote:
> > I can move the irc box to my other network which should
> > stabilize it. It would be located in the same location at 151
> > front street, but in a different cage.
> 
> In light of this I would be considering option b more, but
> servers which have already voted would want to change, maybe
> we should allow them to change their vote if they wish..

Funny how we have had to put up with this crappy performance for an
entire testlink but as soon as it might contribute to failure the
idea comes up to move it somewhere else.  Where was this idea 2
weeks ago when it might have saved some complaints and not screwed
up our voting process?

In the middle of a permlink vote is not a time to be moving servers
about.  I think if the admin wishes to do this then it will require
delink of this server and a testlink all over again with a new
server.  If that's the way you want to go then current linking
policy (http://blitzed.org/docs/policy.phtml) dictates a 30-day wait
between the end of the current link and the start of the new
testlink.  You will need EB agreement to do away with that, but in
this situation I personally will not be recommending doing away with that
30-day break as that time could be usefully spent by the admin to
make sure that everything is actually working properly before
wasting our time.

_______________________________________________
public mailing list
public-Hb7ITwsGSD4lroQnaJEqWdi2O/[email protected]
http://lists.blitzed.org/listinfo/public

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFAkgSdIJm2TL8VSQsRAqAvAJ99GJNcf+5euPFBUa3J9PVOpWxnbgCdHDGz
RAH0mmoBg82Lx0R8NqTMDYs=
=vzUk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----