Re: proposed changes to network policy

On Thu, Nov 25, 2004 at 02:32:09PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-11-25 at 14:13, Andy Smith wrote:
> > If you have an opinion on that, you should probably add it either on
> > that page or on this list.
> 
> If we are that strict to take away the right to vote... please force the
> voting goats to send out reminders. Some of us do not vote on the first
> glance of the voting call because we wait until the discussion
> afterwards comes to its end.

Well I was thinking it would only apply where the fault was found to
lie with the admin concerned and not any other part of the process.
If it was written as something like:

        In cases where a server has failed to vote and EB believe
        that the fault lies with the admin concerned, punishments
        such as temporary loss of voting rights may be in order.
        Persistent failure to vote can lead to delink vote.

would that be more acceptable to you?

I haven't discussed the vote stuff with anyone else before just
writing it on the wiki now, so maybe I am completely off the mark
with my ideas.

_______________________________________________
public mailing list
public-Hb7ITwsGSD4lroQnaJEqWdi2O/[email protected]
http://lists.blitzed.org/listinfo/public

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFBpeA7IJm2TL8VSQsRAjmjAJ0TXZ9y4j63szQkP9LLiPW7V0eY1QCfR8CO
KRIniRo2jp1YhU5m/mBgUTk=
=rx3v
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----