Re: election process for EB members

Phil Spencer <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.irc.blitzed.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
I personally do not see a reason for the EB to change or a vote to be 
conducted. if it were necessary than the admin team would bring it up.
A vote and regular change of the EB would cause more problems than it would 
solve and the network would essentially explode.
not to mention, push comes to shove admins own the servers not EB so if 
things with the current EB ever got out of hand it isn't like it would
be incredibly difficult to kick them to the curb but I do not see any 
reason or situation that could cause that chain of events because grifferz does
all the work no one feels like doing and to discard him means one of us 
lazy staff would have to step up and do his 101 jobs which would also lead 
to the explosion of the network.

Problems of voting:
   Popularity bull
   Propaganda campaigns
   Fighting

Problems of not voting:
   grifferz occasionally complains every few months because he does most of 
the work
   people obsessed with democracy complain.

I like the current system and the people doing the job, democracy causes 
more problems than it solves in certain situations.

The only way I could see a vote being necessary is if one of the EB retired 
like for example IRC was harmful to animals or something and grifferz had 
to leave but other than that it would be a bad idea.

Phil Spencer

At 05:20 PM 1/29/2005, Anton Wolkov wrote:

>let's think of all this, what possible results a vote may give,
>EB staff stays as it is, which gives nothing but an illusion of democracy.
>EB staff changes which creates real democracy with it's problems, and
>in the end may fail miserably, or give nothing.
>though there is the slight chance the change will bring a positive
>result, but it's a small chance, unpredictable, and the stakes are
>pretty high.
>since the current EB would probably have a veto power over this vote,
>I believe, everyone who wants to vote, should post a public comment on
>why, and later this comment will be reviewed by moderators, and only
>if comment makes sense, and you can see the person is not casting
>random votes it should be accepted.
>
>Regards,
>Anton Wolkov
>_______________________________________________
>public mailing list
>public-Hb7ITwsGSD4lroQnaJEqWdi2O/[email protected]
>http://lists.blitzed.org/listinfo/public
>
>
>
>
>--
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
>Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.2 - Release Date: 1/28/2005


-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.2 - Release Date: 1/28/2005
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.