Re: Linux distros for servers that matter
Andy Smith <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.irc.blitzed.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 10:19:59PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote: > > On 3 Feb 2005, at 15:55, Andy Smith wrote: > >[...] with the package management of freebsd or Gentoo. :) > > Those systems are nice because you do not need to wait for a package to > build. Often you could just copy/modify the old build hint to get a new > version. However... about compile flags... you're right when you are > talking about feature set. That's why there are *-heavy packages in > Debian which provide all the functionality. But some programs really > lack things, that's right. But if you talk about optimisations... The > hype about Gentoo was not -- as you know -- really meaningful. The > speed gains are *very* low. I'm not talking about optimisation as I truly believe that the time spent actually administering the system and the advances in the hardware over time will outweigh the minor advantages you can gain by changing compiler flags and disabling parts of the software (except in really strange circumstances). What it's more about is avoiding useless dependencies. For example, there are many packages in Red Hat which depend on the entire of X because they have an optional KDE or gnome component. Even though the upstream author may have been wise enough to provide a configure switch to disable that, the RPM maintainer had to choose between making an RPM with all options or else multiple RPMs with some combination of flags disabled. Debian maintainers may well have been able to do this better, but I don't believe they will have been able to do it as well as BSD ports or gentoo ebuilds do, since those systems can apply per-package compile hints. However it's a minor annoyance I'd be willing to live with.. _______________________________________________ public mailing list public-Hb7ITwsGSD4lroQnaJEqWdi2O/[email protected] http://lists.blitzed.org/listinfo/public
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 187 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCApgfIJm2TL8VSQsRAuqjAKC3VO0dqKSIkuhJ44f4vGm66uf5UwCgiSr5 YQACddifP/87e5uOOJOFhsE= =Z/qX -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----