RFC: ircd choice vote
Andy Smith <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.irc.blitzed.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Things have been quiet of late about what we're doing about modernising our ircd. I believe that the people who are capable of non-trivial ircd coding are now even less likely to have time to do it, and meanwhile we are stuck with an ancient ircd. Bahamut 1.6 which was once the future even now is being obsoleted for 1.8, yet we are still on 1.4. While we can agree that it would be wonderful to take a clean, sane and actively-developed ircd like ratbox and add our required features, and that this is not an incredible amount of work, there is still no one who is really volunteering to take care of that or making any progress on it. Therefore I put it to the admin team that we should take a serious look at switching to unrealircd. Yesterday in msg Phil Kern said something like "I know you have some strange love for Unreal, but.." This took me by surprise! I once recall writing an email rant about how much unrealircd pissed me off, but that rant was mostly targetted at the clueless users of the ircd. I have no love for unrealircd, but no real problem with it either. I'm interested in seeing how well it works, since it appears to support almost all features that we want in an ircd. The only things it doesn't support are things that are unique to Blitzed anyway: umode p and regex qlines. So anyway, in the next few days I want to call an admin vote to determine what we will do about our ircd. One of the options I propose will be "switch to unrealircd once grifferz + ircd team are satisifed that it has the features we need and our services works with it to the level it does now". Another will be "let's do nothing and stick with our current ircd". If we did decide to go for unrealircd then I imagine it would be some weeks or months before I could finish making our services ready for that, but I am unwilling to do that work without committment from the admin team to use the finished product. Does anyone have any other serious suggestions for other choices, other vote options? _______________________________________________ public mailing list public-Hb7ITwsGSD4lroQnaJEqWdi2O/[email protected] http://lists.blitzed.org/listinfo/public
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFC7VNqIJm2TL8VSQsRAjAcAJ9qNsl8t5Is5fu5RtRWWA5P9tQ1twCcD6jh tKuQXg4g17GZwKuJe0KdxoY= =6WIv -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----