Re: ircd development ideas (was Re: Re: RFC: ircd choice vote)

Andy Smith <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.irc.blitzed.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Sun, Aug 07, 2005 at 01:45:20AM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Aug 7, 2005, at 1:31 AM, Andy Smith wrote:
> >But it isn't possible for every ircd to rehash simultaneously and
> >any users who connect while the net is in an inconsistent state
> >would have different hosts on different servers.
> 
> Well I don't think that there is an inconsistent state. All server  
> admins get those keys and enter it into the config file before they  
> link. And they don't get changed. (Without a change there is also no  
> race condition.) By the way: When you change the cloak keys new users  
> could get the same hosts as existing users as the former are not  
> getting new hostmasks.

Sure, but the point is, isn't the fact that you need to put 3 strings
into a conf file and then NEVER CHANGE THEM EVER kind of sucky?
Especially when the strings are effectively a password, so any
former admin or anyone who ever looked at a conf file knows them?

_______________________________________________
public mailing list
public-Hb7ITwsGSD4lroQnaJEqWdi2O/[email protected]
http://lists.blitzed.org/listinfo/public
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFC9UzxIJm2TL8VSQsRAv+1AJ9ub1J2Md/dJq6bYOZtNPjt+l2ikACg1aKe
USw6q3FHiaVpUyZsQEsCMBI=
=Qw+F
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.