Re: Favourite colour

Kevin Mulligan wrote:
> As a philosopher I'd like to point out that your studies are a waste  of 
> time.  Anything with any supposed scientific backing is going to  turn 
> out to be wrong sooner or later.

What a load of twaddle.

> As I already said, talking about colours in relation to light is a  
> non-argument unless you can explain why light would possesses the  
> characteristics of a colour.

Of course "light" possesses the characteristics of a colour. "Light" is 
not just one wavelength, but a collection of wavelengths. And different 
wavelengths represent different colours. So the wavelength is the 
property specifying the colour of the "light".

Matt

-- 
Matt N. Marsh
Email: matt-ko/[email protected]          Yahoo: marshmn
   Web: http://www.mattmarsh.net/  Jabber: mattmarsh-/[email protected]
                                      MSN: matt-ko/[email protected]
                                      ICQ: 250467363
                                      AIM: MattMarshUK