Re: Favourite colour
Mrten <[email protected]> Mon, 15 Aug 2005 02:54:29 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.irc.blitzed.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Om 01:34 op maandag 15 augustus 2005, Kevin Mulligan: >>> You haven't explained anything, all you've done is regurgitate a poor >>> textbook definition of light. Why do wavelengths of light represent >>> different colours? If they really do, why can't the colours be seen >>> as they pass through the air? >> >> why is the sky (sky-)blue? isnt the sky really air? > I'm not entirely sure why the sky is blue. To be consistent in my > argument I would say that one or more of the atmospheric layers > possesses the characteristic falsely known as "sky blue". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rayleigh_scattering http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/atmos/blusky.html > Air, I believe, has no colour which is apparent when it condenses and > forms mist or clouds which are typically white although the presense > of excess water (which, as refraction shows, contains myriad colours) > can turn them black. i think liquid oxygen is pale blue (not sky-blue, mind you!). Mrten. -- http://kyra.ii.nl/~mrten/foto/