Re: hostmangling in new ircd
Mrten <[email protected]> Thu, 25 Aug 2005 02:22:57 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.irc.blitzed.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Om 21:04 op woensdag 24 augustus 2005, Mrten: > Om 19:00 op woensdag 24 augustus 2005, Andy Smith: >> Or we could decide not to mangle it at all and tell people to pick >> longer hosts if they want them mangled. :) >> Thoughts? > yeah. why mangle at all? this *is* a serious question, not a troll. unordered questions: if i, as a channel-op, want to report logs as evidence to a third party, i have to ask the admins for help to translate the mangled hostnames to real ones. do the admins really want to meddle in that? does dcc chat/ping/etc still work? what does *the network* have to gain from hostmasking users? aren't we making it ourselves more difficult? aren't we making it chanops more difficult? Mrten. -- This space intentionally left blank. _______________________________________________ public mailing list public-Hb7ITwsGSD4lroQnaJEqWdi2O/[email protected] http://lists.blitzed.org/listinfo/public
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 191 B)
-----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE----- Version: 6.5.8ckt http://www.ipgpp.com/ iQA/AwUBQw0BUktQMadp+KslEQIn5gCePoNw2SmIaAx/mt4n34VxqM48+IAAoLrk D+v7icsv3m1IrFuIwmdIxGP8 =ZQ6E -----END PGP MESSAGE-----