Re: hostmangling in new ircd
"Mrten" <[email protected]> Thu, 25 Aug 2005 13:24:34 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.irc.blitzed.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> > if i, as a channel-op, want to report logs as evidence to a third > > party, i have to ask the admins for help to translate the mangled > > hostnames to real ones. do the admins really want to meddle in > > that? > How many times does that realistically happen? we wouldnt know, because admins are not involved atm. > How do you currently deal with such issues on IM networks that don't > show hostnames? IRC is virtually the only IM technology that shows > users' hosts. ICQ shows (read: 'has knowledge of') users' hosts. all IM's that have CTCP-like behaviour have, at one time or another. MSN-text travels over Microsoft servers afaik (another reason not to use it), but audio/video and filetransfers don't. > Do you want a channel mode for preventing users with masked hosts > from entering tube? sorry? > Or one that will show their real host in > channels that require their real host to be shown? (I believe irctoo > does this? will be problematic with trying to stop users being > tricked into joining such channels though) how about having chanops see the real hosts of users in their channels? that will still stop the ddos-kiddies and alleviates much of the other objections. > > what does *the network* have to gain from hostmasking users? > > aren't we making it ourselves more difficult? > What we're gaining is that we're getting ever more demands for masked > hosts and when we say we don't have the feature, they go to a > network that does, and it's getting harder and harder to justify why > we don't provide the feature. if its such a demanded feature, why isn't it in bahamut 1.8 already? > Also in channels like the maroc ones their users are being > terrorised by kiddies who DDoS if they don't get chanops and we can > do nothing to help. (ah, the "terrorised"-meme) well, have them register to get a masked host. if you have someone that blackmails you you're fucked anyway. possible side-effect: hostmasking will shift the load of the DDosses to the network instead of the private user. Mrten.