Re: News Flash: CFV: Test link vote for quiche.fr.eu.blitzed.org

On 9/15/05, Andy Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 04:17:00PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > On Sep 15, 2005, at 12:08 , Andy Smith wrote:
> > >But can we decide whether votes should be cast (for all admin votes
> > >after this one) to either staff@lists or [email protected]?  I don't
> > >have a strong opinion either way as long as it's consistent.
> >
> > Testlink votes could IMHO be send to staff@lists, with a rationale
> > for the vote choice. All other votes should (again IMHO) be send in
> > private to [email protected]
> 
> So you don't think it is worth having consistency then?
> 
> What do the vote counters think?
> 
> Personally I think a) you underestimate how much of a mess it is
> when half the admins vote to one place and half to another and even
> some with the wrong method, and b) there is no logical reason for
> some votes to be cast in public and others not.
> 
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iD8DBQFDKYNyIJm2TL8VSQsRAutzAKCLh3rFRpJAEGS6P1mzo0KlujrJMgCfappu
> cXtue8AZZlgMPmvguCq3vM0=
> =F+BB
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> public mailing list
> public-Hb7ITwsGSD4lroQnaJEqWdi2O/[email protected]
> http://lists.blitzed.org/listinfo/public
> 
> 
> 

As a vote counter I'd rather at *least* all votes go to vote@ so that
they are easily filtered and easy to find.

Personally I'd rather they were only sent to vote@ as I generally
believe votes should be private to eliminate any chance of people
passively voting for what others are voting.
-- 
Antony Seedhouse
http://cba.me.uk