Re: Executive Board Nominations
"Antony Seedhouse" <[email protected]> Wed, 21 Mar 2007 11:06:16 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.irc.blitzed.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 3/20/07, Simon Pearson <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 20:05 +0000, Antony Seedhouse wrote: > > It is time again to elect a new Executive Board, to decide the three > > people who will have the power to decide the course of the network for > > the next twelve months. > > I would like to stand for EB again this year; after being voted in as EB > member last year but deciding to stand down for a number of reasons, I > chose to stand down. However, more recently, things look on the up, as > there seems to be some more interest and we've recruited some new > servers and staff as a result. > > The past 12 months, as Antony mentioned, hasn't been so great; however, > looking forward, things could really pick up and personally, I would be > more than prepared to help on getting things going again with OPM and > IRCd/services. Stability isn't something to write home about over the > past year, perhaps something to think about. > > As far as day-to-day administration of the network goes, we had some > issues with large botnet attacks; however, these issues are now > resolved. Was very active with day-to-day AKILLing/services quarantining > of drones etc. > > Past Blitzed 'experience' includes OPM administrator, web team member, > server admin tabasco.hub and now tabasco.uk. In addition, I have helped > Blitzed by way of resources 'behind the scenes' by providing a static.* > mirror and a powerdns geodns backup. > > Over the next twelve months, I personally would like to finally see > Blitzed move to a new IRCd, something less ancient and buggy. Again, in > that respect, two competent IRCd coders would be willing to help > Blitzed; this is a good thing as we only currently have one or two > active C coders. Coupled with that, services could possibly be looked > at, there are still some issues from years ago including more/better > caching. > > OPM is, again, something that would be good to get back online as there > is currently no other equally as effective DNSBL for all IRC networks. > After all, all the reporting stuff is in BOPM, so it was a very > successful and sane solution for IRC networks. There are some > equivalents now, such as AHBL, but they're nowhere near as popular as > OPM was. In addition, OPM made Blitzed quite a respected network and > brought some interest to the network. > > Cheers, > -- > Simon 'sonorous' Pearson > _______________________________________________ > public mailing list > public-Hb7ITwsGSD4lroQnaJEqWdi2O/[email protected] > http://lists.blitzed.org/listinfo/public > Seconded -- Antony Seedhouse