Re: Re: exclude network from any scan
Andy Smith <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.irc.bopm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 04:52:01PM +0400, "Alex HangMan" wrote:
> The solution is:
>
> exempt {
> mask = "*!*@10.10.******";
> };
>
>
> ...it must be joke...
Does this work for you:
exempt {
mask = "*!*@10.10.*";
};
?
Also, you say "I don't care if this is bad or wrong" - it's not bad
or wrong if you have IRC users from a host that has a proxy on it
that your BOPM host is actually authorized to use. That is the
exact purpose of the exempt {} block in fact since anyone running
both a bopm and a proxy on their network probably is in the
situation where the bopm is allowed to use the proxy...
It is the use of exempt {} to allow remote broken proxies that is
discouraged since human nature suggests that these proxies will
never be fixed if tolerated.
--
Andy Smith -- Occasional BOPM Developer And Support Monkey. Please copy
all BOPM support queries to the BOPM list, _not_ just directly to me!
If I've helped you with BOPM then please check my wishlist!
http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/registry/23IJ4U7N4J3X9
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 187 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAjmhHIJm2TL8VSQsRApdvAKC9D+EtODpUzKCS7a99feoaS9jqyACfXwd/ 9uk9KsZJHBhUBFhQn7F3cN0= =hb7V -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----