Re: Re:BOPM not scanning properly
Andy Smith <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.irc.bopm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sun, May 16, 2004 at 07:03:04PM -0400, Kristen Doyle wrote: > just as a hint the entire 127 class A shouldnt be resolvable at all because > 127.* is reserved for the local host this is defined in a RFC and is pretty > much universal that you cannot have a 127.* host without it being on the > local machine It is a convention for DNSBLs to include a record for the IP address 127.0.0.2. The things in most DNSBLs are also not IP addresses or host names and the RFCs that apply to IP addresses and hostnames do not apply to them. hi_2_u.opm.blitzed.org. A 255.255.255.255 is legal in a zone file, for example. -- Andy Smith -- Occasional BOPM Developer And Support Monkey. Please copy all BOPM support queries to the BOPM list, _not_ just directly to me! If I've helped you with BOPM then please check my wishlist! http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/registry/23IJ4U7N4J3X9
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 187 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAqA5gIJm2TL8VSQsRAgKvAKCabpInjoLvrgobAZvIuHFpTG/GQgCgmrSt ONa7GqQ2MtB+f49jhmU3cDM= =lJou -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----