Re: Re: [opm] memory leak?
Darko Ilic <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.irc.bopm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
We have had the similar problem since forever, so I just setup a script that restarts the bot every 1 hour. And indeed, memory usage never goes down - only up. Darko p.s. A copy of this accidently went to HERTZ. Sorry. ongeboren wrote: >--- David Leadbeater <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >>ongeboren wrote: >>[..] >> >> >>><lirbopm> Number of connects: 275848 >>> >>> >>(366.95/minute) >>[..] >> >> >> >>>So, lets get back to the point and try to >>> >>> >>determine if >> >> >>>this is a leak and if this is the case fix it. >>> >>> >>Just consider what BOPM is doing for a second, it is >>scanning >>several ports for each connection the number >>dependant on how >>many ports you have set in the configuration. >> >>Say for example you have 10 ports for each host, >>this is 3670 >>ports per minute. The default timeout is 30 seconds >>and say >>for example half of all connections have a drop all >>firewall >>(no idea how realistic that is), you could assume >>that a single >>connection will stay around for about 15 seconds. >>This means a >>scanner needs just over 900 fds to even have a hope >>of keeping up with >>your load. >> >>I'm of course assuming you have been quite >>conservative here >>and are only scanning 10 ports on each host. >> >>The output of fdstat interesting to see as well as >>knowing how you >>have BOPM setup.. >> >> >> > >You did a very realistic approximation for the FDs! >I tried _once_ just for fun to scan more than 30 ports >on each host and the FDs in use jumped to about 12000. > >Please, read my previous e-mail to the list for the >answers on your questions. Let me know if you would >need more details. > >Regards, >ongeboren > >__________________________________________________ >Do You Yahoo!? >Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around >http://mail.yahoo.com > > > >