Re: Re: [opm] memory leak?

Jan Chrillesen <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.irc.bopm
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Mon, 03 Jan 2005, ongeboren <[email protected]> wrote:

> The file descriptors are alright. The system allows me
> to use 65K FDs (this is the limit for the bot) and
> this load is foreseen in the config file. The bot uses
> about 600-800 FD in the evening and 60-120 in the
> night. I use 2 scanners, one that scans 10
> port/protocol pairs and another that scans 30-35 such
> pairs. I use the extended scanner on limited networks
> that has been proved to have proxies on strange port
> numbers. The mashine the bot is running on can stand
> this heavy load without much problems, despite the
> female name ;-)

What's your settings for the fd, timeout and max_read variables in the
config file? I'm prtty sure we needed to lower the timeout value to
keep the memory usage under control when doing heavy scanning.

This is our stats. I know it's still a lot of memory but it seems
stable.

08:52 < TeleOPM> Uptime: 2 weeks, 5 days, 06:02:36
08:52 < TeleOPM> DNSBL: 5134 reports sent
08:52 < TeleOPM> Found 2414 (HTTP) open.
08:52 < TeleOPM> Found 123 (HTTPPOST) open.
08:52 < TeleOPM> Found 2533 (SOCKS4) open.
08:52 < TeleOPM> Found 75 (SOCKS5) open.
08:52 < TeleOPM> Number of connects: 606032 (21.86/minute)

$ grep -c "^protocol = " irc.inet.tele.dk.conf
583

bopm      41551 22.9 31.0 161472 161336  ??  S    16Dec04 4598:32.91
bin/bopm -c irc.inet.tele.dk

Regards
Jan
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.