Re: DNSBL: %s: Unknown Error responses for new RBL
"Snowy Angelique Maslov aka 'Snowpony'" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.irc.bopm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Andy Smith said the following on 3/06/2005 4:58 AM: > On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 05:30:18PM +0100, David Leadbeater wrote: > >>On 2 Jun 2005, at 05:34, Snowy Angelique Maslov aka 'Snowpony' wrote: >> >> >>>I've been trying to incorporate a new RBL whilst using BOPM and I >>>continue to come up with the same issue. The RBL I am trying to >>>include is bogons.cymru.com. >> >>Why? >> >>If a bogon address is able to complete a TCP handshake then is it a >>bogon address? As I told David privately they are able to complete a TCP handshake because some of the other clients where I host my server use unallocated address space for internal applications. I don't really want to have them on the system; I use RBLs for other parts of the system and would like to standardise on which ones I use. > Indeed, hijacked IPs would make far more sense... > > http://www.us.sorbs.net/faq/zombie.shtml Indeed it would. This however does not solve the error problem that I am seeing. I imagine there are bound to be other RBLs that may return a TXT value on any sort of query instead of nothing at all. If this is the case then any of these RBLs would be hard to use with bopm. Unless of course I've missed some configuration setting and am an idiot which of course is not completely out of the question ;). -- Snowy "Snowpony" Angelique Cerise Maslov -- http://snowy.org/email.signature PGP (GnuPG) fingerprint = 5280 6EBC D281 A9D2 564B E274 B2EC 54C3 8325 CECD Email not addressed/CCd to [email protected] BOUNCE. READ URL for disclaimer! "Ignorance killed the cat, sir. Curiosity was framed." ---C.J. Cherryh