Re: Curious about reported proxies
"Steve Random" <[email protected]> Tue, 29 Nov 2005 16:08:32 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.irc.bopm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <00cb01c5f531$70695100$9601a8c0@quackmaster> |
I wait the alloted time. Te page it shows it shows because it did scan and didnt show anything. I just use the regular bopm setup no extra ports. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Erik Fears" <[email protected]> To: "Steve Random" <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2005 1:27 PM Subject: Re: [bopm] Curious about reported proxies >> I have my scanners reporting like a good little irc admin and out of >> bordem and wanting to see what a user sees when they load the webpage >> they get when they are banned. And out of the few I checked some were >> accecpted and some werent. Was just curious how my scanner can detect a >> proxie and 5 minutes later the blitzed scanner doesn't. >> Uptime: 2 weeks, 0 days, 07:40:12 >> DNSBL: 60 reports sent >> Found 22 (HTTP) open. >> Found 34 (HTTPPOST) open. >> Found 4 (ROUTER) open. >> I'm kinda curious how many of those are reported as "false reports" >> >> Static/Random >> IRCstorm/FreeJavaChat > > How long did you wait? There's a massive scan queue on the blitzed side, > so the IPs are not immediately scanned. > > Furthermore, you may be scanning ports/protocols that blitzed does not? > > -Erik