Re: Questions for eventual Python module

On tir, 2002-08-27 at 14:15, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 10:56:36AM +0200, Christian Borup wrote:
> > If a rewrite is consitered, it might make more sense to shift to
> > GSignals (as they no longer depends on gtk+ byt only glib). Rather than
> > adding introspection to the existing system.
> 
> Oh, and GLIB signals aren't powerful enough for irssi anyway. At least they
> weren't in 1.2.x.
> 

Not powerfull enough? How so?

I won't be insulted or anything, I just figured GSignals would be nice
as they are easily marshalled into perl (or python if you're into that
kinda thing).

./borup