Re: XMPP-PubSub vs. remoteStorag

On 05.09.2014 21:40, Tobias Kräntzer wrote:
> Am 03.09.2014 um 16:30 schrieb Florian Schmaus <[email protected]>:
> 
>>> The question is, how should the items in the collections be mapped
>>> between the two APIs. remoteStorage is tree based and PubSub is
>>> somehow „list-based“.
>>
>> Isn't PubSub with XEP-248 (PubSub Collection Nodes) also tree based?
> 
> XEP-248 looks quite complicated. Also the proposal is deferred.

Ignore the 'deferred'. It only means that no one is taking care of the
XEP, not automatically it's has some major drawbacks (but this could
also be the case.

I know this is an old thread, but I just came across XEP0-214: File
Repository and Sharing [1], which describes a similar approach. You may
want to have a look at it, if you are still pursuing this project.

- Florian

1: http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0214.html

_______________________________________________
JDev mailing list
Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
Unsubscribe: [email protected]
_______________________________________________

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=
=eqm5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----