Re: self signed cert
Tomasz Sterna <[email protected]> Tue, 03 May 2016 17:52:00 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.jabber.devel,gmane.network.jabber.jabberd2 |
|---|---|
| Organization | Xiaoka.com |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
W dniu 03.05.2016, wto o godzinie 02∶12 -0700, użytkownik [email protected] napisał: > jabberd2 version(2.3.6) > I followed these instructions: > https://github.com/jabberd2/jabberd2/wiki/InstallGuide-OpenSSLConfigu > ration > [...] > SM : sx (ssl.c:405) secure channel not established, handshake in > progress > SM : sx (ssl.c:59) verify error:num=18:self signed > certificate:depth=0:/C=US/ST=state/L=city/O=none/OU=none > /CN=mydomain.org/[email protected] > ---------------------------------------------------- I guess I could catch X509_V_ERR_DEPTH_ZERO_SELF_SIGNED_CERT (18) in SSL_CTX_set_verify callback and pass the cert through, but I'm ambivalent about it... We should really discourage use of self-signed certificates. On the other hand, it really speeds-up test deployments. Maybe have it as an opition, to enable if you really-really need to use self-signed certificates? What do you think? -- smoku @ http://abadcafe.pl/ @ http://xiaoka.com/ _______________________________________________ JDev mailing list Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 473 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAABCAAGBQJXKMkgAAoJEMbh7DlLbipikecIAMZpYvCvY9gAC5RjE4fnvrgV uFqIzIE0Oh5eIeVei+uouMRAgYToKLEvh2oMwWnXnO+fBMwgHhPOeRdu61opGarj JzUZzkQ4IOiY+AtAl3153riQGFdHYLK8NOpahDLslsiUXjmy8AEspir9pXBAcoXW m2YSlUEYeXpme5mJbrhinwYYRjJ7QM0NQd9GXZEVpQ4OS6MIlYxMYIHhayi/cC3d cBB47KD9daRrVxqP1nWRBxF1KEOrRmDLnq436yKWnWCOsy2yR9ii9Ny55NT6m+JK EJ8OnnuILpi9gzqG1XeRfZRwIcTSco3o7cQDwr5oZesbVsZwsmPfRYnAL8eM6oI= =F5gK -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----