RE: 'Private' messages in Exodus

The only case I can think of that isn't covered is illustrated by the following:
Suppose an application wishes suppress messages with 'naughty' words.
The application couldn't use the 'pre' signal. (No IM dialogs would ever occur)
The application couldn't use the 'special' signal. (Filter is not possible)
The 'packet' signal is too late, the IM will display.

(However for the cases I'm currently interested in, what you propose is great!)
-Fred


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Peter Millard
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2004 4:05 PM
To: Exodus development
Subject: Re: [Exodus-dev] 'Private' messages in Exodus


Fred O'Leary wrote:
> Understand. So what I would need to do to both peek at and trap packets
> would be as follows:
[RegisterCallbacks snipped]

Yes, exactly. Are there circumstances that you can contrive where those 4
signals would not be sufficient?

pgm.


_______________________________________________
Exodus-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://jabberstudio.org/mailman/listinfo/exodus-dev