Re: Should XEP features with apparent impact be hidden to older clients?
Stephen Paul Weber <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.jabber.standards-jig |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>This was not my idea for this spec at all, but it's where consensus got us. To be fair we were doing this for many years before this spec. But this spec makes it much, much nicer and I'm very grateful for it. I'm curious to hear more about how your vision differed from current use. _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEWeaCw+rzmiEMpzU00RwpEc5RnN4FAmk5w9wACgkQ0RwpEc5R nN5FhhAAtliflgdm7meAhtGEUtHQjjfWik3gDQzmXOszObKSkTO5VaJjIg9tFvT4 gBRYnkeP19YCaZsrJg3ocYlcmLRLbYuBedpBcE3AYVmAUH3PkR2GbcssjnT//L2i FVfltoxYEW6s++9A9vZmedDVayHpxvTXyjVyTFVAMPUjmX3CFQOwJxFjQEd3C3or dY5ZTzEuNGhKoydO1Zmgsz0v0pYBdSAq/rOSTVXU+VbzZURF7ngUu7EhvimyDErP msGnw+rwWIkcen1w/1jhfUyIYGEmxQS66G5CzmsgcGjdXDGpEJNZpmDW0PXcgy3z /I+OMM2qP6ImzjHhLcvl13GUq1NCM759MhYn4PmBjNv9vfwvLD7IQcOYlTr5hvzz IDYzPxntVlLflzYUF4EkKgLwDf/kgaTeVvMdqbsVFse1WE/B0QHdA4qrJf4gDLSf R2Xi7O5fJNSRqECs9DMOGpIVUCGEJaqsxTbANyL/8/OLXjEDIzV1xgCPKK0hP23F xiJHm84b11NVx+e5FZdRVtIOFrjVQDlEMso8ZqahekbWU+9H1sUOJJg8fijf3+0f 1Y/d9E+UI8ZJUyC6GMhLIqvTJB1kez+KH90z4rGkySw61ib56rvlZaYg462nMkFu sOJtloxVucVZLf/PntIe1WyuLXvkLzna4ds8N9cH0GOuSQhWoHU= =MR8A -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----