Re: LAST CALL: XEP-0484 (Fast Authentication Streamlining Tokens)

Stephen Paul Weber <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.jabber.standards-jig
Message-ID <[email protected]>
>I know the last call is already over, but we should not advance that spec 
>to
>stable until the underlying I-D for HT tokens is stable.

This is a good thought, but fast doesn't rely on or mandate HT so I dint 
think it affects the xep per se?

I'm aware that in prrctise implementations are using HT before it is stable 
which is a problem for these implementations.
_______________________________________________
Standards mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.