Re: Proposed XMPP Extension: End-to-End Encrypted Contacts Metadata

Badri <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.jabber.standards-jig
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi all,

Chiming in to the "group vs. separate items" debate: my understanding of 
the intended setup is that contacts are largely handled on the client 
side, with the server being utilised only to synchronise the list 
between devices (so we don't fetch the entire roster every time we 
connect, but only listen for changes to the roster records).

If this is the case, wouldn't a separate item for each contact makes 
more sense? When I add or update a record on one device, the other 
devices will need to download (or be sent) only the changed records 
rather than having to re-download the entire roster. Even in the case of 
a multi-thousand item roster, a new client has to fetch that enormous 
roster just once, and can subsequently fetch only the changed nodes.

The "downside" if we can call it one is that the server will know the 
exact count of contacts each user has in their roster. But I'm not sure 
this is something to be concerned about.

Best,
Badri

_______________________________________________
Standards mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.