Re: Presence problem in large MUC rooms.
Nicolas Cedilnik <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.jabber.standards-jig |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, It was not mentioned in this thread, so I need to ask: wouldn't 0436 and 0463 (presence and affiliation versioning) solve most of presence spam on (re)joining a MUC? I plan (someday) to implement it in slidge, is there still interest from client developers about it? Maybe, just an idea, if we have a certain type of "space" where we expect everybody to be in all rooms, the XEPs could be extended to be "trans-MUC", not specific to a single MUC? -- Nicolas _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]