Re: Proposal: Add <no-notify/> hint to XEP-0334 (Message Processing Hints)
Matthew Wild <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.jabber.standards-jig |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAJt9-x7_o3Dr1XXo_k=7J2JC3VaBQJ=82rRyV6jNJcC1vYTjtw@mail.gmail.com> |
On Fri, 6 Feb 2026 at 20:21, Thilo Molitor <[email protected]> wrote: > > Does this even need a namespace bump if it only adds a new element, but does > not alter existing ones? Technically, yes. *Personally*, I don't feel strongly about this because none of my implementations would break. However there are several implementations of XMPP which actually depend somewhat on the schema of a namespace remaining stable, and would reject elements that don't conform to the schema. That schemas don't change is something we reinforced as a community years ago when we adopted the practice of namespace versioning. > At least on apple there is something called focus mode that automatically > silences every notification, but allows apps to break through focus mode. > Maybe we should add another hint for urgent messages as well, that can be used > by clients to break focus mode, aka: > <urgent xmlns='urn:xmpp:hints'/> As Philipp pointed out, this is definitely XEP-0224 which is already implemented in a number of clients. Interestingly this new proposal is essentially the opposite of XEP-0224 (a missed opportunity to include it in that spec, too - as some kind of urgency=high/low). Regards, Matthew _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]