Re: Proposal: Add <no-notify/> hint to XEP-0334 (Message Processing Hints)

Matthew Wild <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.jabber.standards-jig
Message-ID <CAJt9-x7_o3Dr1XXo_k=7J2JC3VaBQJ=82rRyV6jNJcC1vYTjtw@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, 6 Feb 2026 at 20:21, Thilo Molitor <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Does this even need a namespace bump if it only adds a new element, but does
> not alter existing ones?

Technically, yes. *Personally*, I don't feel strongly about this
because none of my implementations would break. However there are
several implementations of XMPP which actually depend somewhat on the
schema of a namespace remaining stable, and would reject elements that
don't conform to the schema. That schemas don't change is something we
reinforced as a community years ago when we adopted the practice of
namespace versioning.

> At least on apple there is something called focus mode that automatically
> silences every notification, but allows apps to break through focus mode.
> Maybe we should add another hint for urgent messages as well, that can be used
> by clients to break focus mode, aka:
> <urgent xmlns='urn:xmpp:hints'/>

As Philipp pointed out, this is definitely XEP-0224 which is already
implemented in a number of clients. Interestingly this new proposal is
essentially the opposite of XEP-0224 (a missed opportunity to include
it in that spec, too - as some kind of urgency=high/low).

Regards,
Matthew
_______________________________________________
Standards mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.