Re: Proposed XMPP Extension: Explicit Mentions
Maxime Buquet <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.jabber.standards-jig |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <abQGvf5JL42QOCCO@kea> |
On 2026/03/13, snit via Standards wrote: > Again, no characters are treated as special here. Everything that applies to '@' applies to anything else, as well. IF you decide to send extra characters with your mentions, you include them in the range. It doesn't matter what those characters are. The receiver shouldn't need to care either; that's kind of the entire point. I guess that's where we disagree. As a receiving implementation, why would you have to display an "implementation detail" from another client? You can't actually remove that implementation detail if you feel it should not be displayed in your client, as you do not understand it. _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEhA/T3MqZjUNP0hVd3tp0ruyp0PIFAmm0B9UACgkQ3tp0ruyp 0PKuRg/+JNRfMjB3/TmqyCFJoS7IkOYocklSw3ZgMXOm/mEiH8fAlKWzhzCbAq3R +r8g+L1QoSy+n6R1GGayPEIYAAmMSCdLgvslv8iryCw42JCBypE9OqSmojCLDQ2v 0USXk4USNp1bJ7imynoAPPjOGk072IXT5UkM3Cr5tQqjDOnndA9Q9HKFXkLLEQmE KTu2q8/WfiMJIoI5haDCk60o50BkRQHRO+0hXkNl0++qLyoOm7QKg6Ke93hblK8m WsFnE8rhEWyOhWupDVXMkLYekLUAUx0B7vR6sYVtJ+zjXoVxV8Hl0C4MA7eorJcd 942lgOJpXQKeAtXLYxOOjnNbxi/a1ujZE+XjsD4VBORe5x2kDvVffyojc+764sGm rZ8i0qhNp9alHUXoVEOuiKtc0mdTWWJeU2BTDD71ShvbVG8j/kouOfIMtasUruFb WdfN8WF+LErYv5tYGuRvP/akfWZpJ18DvWBUb/z44p0WmpEQ1UMoRAAUldCeKoD/ 2XW5DUv4EAseVox/fLNUQVfCuNecZR+PXrnnJ4Cf7qrbPo59WFikA8Y4JcK92R9v 49P5fO6yTq8aUG4rNolft0ecHudjC2C8dlctmE5PLSvM3Nkc2V0Uh7xkjNYUKol0 6Mfhyr9Z/uzwkto3UHV7eYhHimKhL3GQUMN14Op6nUqHn8Xc/Aw= =ATUb -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----