Re: Reinstating XHTML-IM (XEP-0071)
Sergei Ilinykh <[email protected]> Sun, 15 Mar 2026 10:11:49 +0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.jabber.standards-jig |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CALV4eUW44H-Qs=smrURYsvBAGYB0XWvWcPNVNAfptMH2zVy8HA@mail.gmail.com> |
I just came to say I'm with guys. XHTML-IM is nice and should live. Best Regards, Sergei вс, 15 мар. 2026 г. в 04:43, Stephen Paul Weber <[email protected]>: > >I am not an XSF member, yet I am interested to reinstate XHTML-IM. > > I am very much in favour of this. While deprecation in favour of > https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0393.html may have seemed simpler at the > time, new work like https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0394.html > demonstrates > that this is not enough and there is an appetite for full rich text. The > standardized rich tezt format is HTML which has the benefit (for us) of > having an obvious XML syntax and a pre existing XEP. > > Besides this we also have new and acitve uses of XHTML-IM in the community > (not just by me) and leaving the XEP deprecated is confusing in this > context. > _______________________________________________ > Standards mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]